REEL Musings: Are Judd Apatow comedies getting old?
April 23rd, 2008

Before I get to far along, let me say that I’ve enjoyed all of the films Apatow has written and directed, and most of the films he has had a producing hand in. The thing is, while I was watching FORGETTING SARAH MARSHALL this past weekend, I got the creeping feeling that maybe we’re starting to get over-exposed to his repetitive brand of humor and his shtick is going to start getting old soon.
Part of the problem is the plots, as almost without fail the majority of the movies he’s been involved with feature slacker boy-men having to grow up, stop being immature, oblivious, or stunted and learn to be sensitive, mature, men-men who have squared off against their supposed shortcomings and come out on the other side. In telling these stories, the movies all feature the same mix of crass humor and big heart, which eventually give way to a happy poignant ending and moral lessons. In theory, that’s not a bad thing, but – again – the repetition is the rub. During FORGETTING SARAH MARSHALL while I was laughing, I often felt a sense of déjà vu, and it was largely because I was laughing at the same style of jokes I’d been laughing at for a while now. Yes, they are still funny, and they are still great enough to work multiple times (like any particular brand of humor) but there inevitably has to come a point where these films start risking that you might not laugh anymore at some of the jokes because you feel you’ve heard them before.
Another problem that I think is emerging is something that is ironically enough one of the strengths of Apatow productions. It’s what one might call, the Apatow comedy troupe. By that I mean the staple of actors that continue to appear in his productions. It’s not just that the repetition of seeing the same actors appear again and again. After all, DiCaprio is pretty much in every Scorcese film now. The difference is that DiCaprio isn’t doing the same thing each time they work together. That’s not the case with the Apatow troupe. The awesome Paul Rudd is the only one who at least does something different each time. Everyone else – as much as I love them and hate to rag on them – just doesn’t have much range. Just look at Jonah Hill who keeps playing the same character. Even Seth Rogen, who I consider untouchable because of his “Freaks and Geeks” days, is basically playing the same character in the same way over and over again, which might be why I can’t get myself excited over PINEAPPLE EXPRESS.
So far I’m still laughing my butt off, but creeping into my laughter is a wee bit of weariness, and sense of familiarity that if further encouraged by too many Apatow comedies like 40-YEAR OLD VIRGIN, KNOCKED UP, SUPERBAD, and FORGETTING SARAH MARSHALL, it might just stop being funny. After all, a good thing is a good thing until you run it into the ground. I hope Apatow and his protégés can learn to avoid that fate.
What do you guys think? Am I being too hard on Apatow’s films and the one’s he produces? Is this even a problem limited to Apatow, or all modern comedians? After all, Will Ferrell keeps making sports movies and Ben Stiller keeps on playing that guy who starts out calm and then has manic, cringe-worthy outbursts.














Denny Says:
April 25th, 2008 at 7:40 am
Would Laurel and Hardy be Laurel and Hardy if they didn’t always play Laurel and Hardy?
I guess there’s something to be said for finding your niche and sticking to it. After all, the audience is still laughing its butts off, as you said, and I think we all know that we don’t expect the Apatow movies to be gut-wrenching thrillers with Shyamalan-trademark twist endings.
Writers can’t win - too much repetition and people complain that they’re one-trick ponies; too much stylistic lily-pad-jumping and they become multi-coloured poisonous frogs that are nice to look at but that we wouldn’t touch with a 10-foot pole.
Predictability and meeting the audience’s expectation in almost any art form have proven to be formulas for success. Vonnegut’s novels all have the same basic themes, and many fans of his (myself included) feel at some level that if you’ve read one or two of his books you’ve read them all. This doesn’t mean his whole catalogue is devalued - in fact, its integrity is further cemented in the overall canon by having clear and concise messages and themes that connect each work.
So are all of Apatow’s movies the same? Probably. Would we have it any other way? Probably not.