<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: REEL Review: HANCOCK</title>
	<link>http://thereeladdict.com/reel-review-hancock/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 00:35:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Miles</title>
		<link>http://thereeladdict.com/reel-review-hancock/#comment-4432</link>
		<dc:creator>Miles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 14:05:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thereeladdict.com/reel-review-hancock/#comment-4432</guid>
		<description>Before I saw it I commented to friends that the posters seemed like this was two different movies: one of the movies was a light-hearted affair so was appropriate for Will Smith to be gingerly laying on the letters that make up Hancock, the other was a slick action film with a badass Will Smith in shades.

Turns out the posters were right. This very much was two movies, It's one of those films that's more or less fine when you're watching it, but then when you think back on it you find more and more things that didn't add up and you feel a little cheated.

The shift from recovering alcoholic Hancock to recovering memory Hancock didn't work for me. It was way too easy for him to get better. Solving one heist and he's suddenly fine? I didn't know substance abuse problems could be fixed with one grand gesture. What are those alcoholics complaining about with their 12 steps? This film showed me it's only one, you lazy drunks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Before I saw it I commented to friends that the posters seemed like this was two different movies: one of the movies was a light-hearted affair so was appropriate for Will Smith to be gingerly laying on the letters that make up Hancock, the other was a slick action film with a badass Will Smith in shades.</p>
<p>Turns out the posters were right. This very much was two movies, It&#8217;s one of those films that&#8217;s more or less fine when you&#8217;re watching it, but then when you think back on it you find more and more things that didn&#8217;t add up and you feel a little cheated.</p>
<p>The shift from recovering alcoholic Hancock to recovering memory Hancock didn&#8217;t work for me. It was way too easy for him to get better. Solving one heist and he&#8217;s suddenly fine? I didn&#8217;t know substance abuse problems could be fixed with one grand gesture. What are those alcoholics complaining about with their 12 steps? This film showed me it&#8217;s only one, you lazy drunks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: theREELaddict</title>
		<link>http://thereeladdict.com/reel-review-hancock/#comment-4349</link>
		<dc:creator>theREELaddict</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 17:01:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thereeladdict.com/reel-review-hancock/#comment-4349</guid>
		<description>Nothing tickles my heart more than polarization! 

Jess, I certainly see your point. HANCOCK is exactly what a summer blockbuster should be. I suppose why I had issues with it was because in that first half I thought it transcended that a little bit. In that sense it wasn't that I had preconceived ideas or high expectations going into the movie. It was that the first half gave me preconceived ideas and high expectations, and in my opinion failed to deliver on that. If the first half had been more like the second, then who knows, I might have enjoyed it much more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nothing tickles my heart more than polarization! </p>
<p>Jess, I certainly see your point. HANCOCK is exactly what a summer blockbuster should be. I suppose why I had issues with it was because in that first half I thought it transcended that a little bit. In that sense it wasn&#8217;t that I had preconceived ideas or high expectations going into the movie. It was that the first half gave me preconceived ideas and high expectations, and in my opinion failed to deliver on that. If the first half had been more like the second, then who knows, I might have enjoyed it much more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jess</title>
		<link>http://thereeladdict.com/reel-review-hancock/#comment-4338</link>
		<dc:creator>jess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 13:38:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thereeladdict.com/reel-review-hancock/#comment-4338</guid>
		<description>I 100% disagree with this review. I truly enjoyed this film from start to finish. I thought it was a great combination of fun and heart.  Everything about it was what I expect a summer blockbuster to be entertaining. I think the reason people are often disappointed with movies is because they go into the movie with preconceived ideas. I mean i was surprised at all by the supposed plot twist but that doesn't mean I didn't enjoy the movie. I saw it was one of Will Smith's best.  And would encourage others to give it a try.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I 100% disagree with this review. I truly enjoyed this film from start to finish. I thought it was a great combination of fun and heart.  Everything about it was what I expect a summer blockbuster to be entertaining. I think the reason people are often disappointed with movies is because they go into the movie with preconceived ideas. I mean i was surprised at all by the supposed plot twist but that doesn&#8217;t mean I didn&#8217;t enjoy the movie. I saw it was one of Will Smith&#8217;s best.  And would encourage others to give it a try.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan from NZ</title>
		<link>http://thereeladdict.com/reel-review-hancock/#comment-4333</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan from NZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 09:05:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thereeladdict.com/reel-review-hancock/#comment-4333</guid>
		<description>Fully 100% agree with that review! I've still been sitting here wanting to go back to that point and wondering what could've been if it hadn't changed so much then. Ace review!@</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fully 100% agree with that review! I&#8217;ve still been sitting here wanting to go back to that point and wondering what could&#8217;ve been if it hadn&#8217;t changed so much then. Ace review!@</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the TV addict &#187; Blog Archive &#187; This Week on the Addict Network™</title>
		<link>http://thereeladdict.com/reel-review-hancock/#comment-4303</link>
		<dc:creator>the TV addict &#187; Blog Archive &#187; This Week on the Addict Network™</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 14:03:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thereeladdict.com/reel-review-hancock/#comment-4303</guid>
		<description>[...] the REEL Addict We reviewed HANCOCK, posted the first five minutes of THE DARK KNIGHT and revealed some of our favorite Canadian actors [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] the REEL Addict We reviewed HANCOCK, posted the first five minutes of THE DARK KNIGHT and revealed some of our favorite Canadian actors [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the REEL Addict &#187; Blog Archive &#187; This Week on the Addict Network™</title>
		<link>http://thereeladdict.com/reel-review-hancock/#comment-4302</link>
		<dc:creator>the REEL Addict &#187; Blog Archive &#187; This Week on the Addict Network™</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 14:02:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thereeladdict.com/reel-review-hancock/#comment-4302</guid>
		<description>[...] the REEL Addict We reviewed HANCOCK, posted the first five minutes of THE DARK KNIGHT and revealed some of our favorite Canadian actors [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] the REEL Addict We reviewed HANCOCK, posted the first five minutes of THE DARK KNIGHT and revealed some of our favorite Canadian actors [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
