twilight

Why Tom Cruise in TROPIC THUNDER Isn’t As Great As You Think

August 21st, 2008

tom cruise

Though I stand by what I said earlier about Tom Cruise’s role as an obese, hairy, foul-mouthed, bottom-line coveting megalomaniacal producer, I don’t quite get the wild acclaim he’s receiving for it, especially since the more I think about it, the more I realize something: the only reason it works is because we know its Tom Cruise.

If it were any other actor in the role it wouldn’t elicit a single laugh, and probably just make you squirm in your seat uncomfortably. It just boils down to a one-note comedic character using the “F” word a lot, and that kind of thing gets old fast. Even with Cruise it gets a bit old, in no small part because it’s a nail that keeps getting hammered, and because he’s done this before better, with actual acting and more substance in MAGNOLIA (“Respect the c—k, tame the c—t!”). Nevertheless, it works in TROPIC THUNDER because there is delight to be had in Tom Cruise acting completely contrary to his image (as an actor and otherwise) and doing it with such gleeful zany (dancing) relish. A great performance? No. A fun one? Sure.


I think audiences are responding to that fun, zany energy, even if the role really amounts to all sound and fury, signifying nothing except perhaps the revival of Tom Cruise’s career. Perhaps that’s the reason he’s getting so much fanfare though. I think it’s indicative of the fact that I years people have been secretly wanting to like him again (he is still one of the biggest movie stars in the world after all) but never could find a legitimate reason to do so until now. That’s probably why opening night it wasn’t Robert Downey Jr. but Mr. Cruise who was met with thunderous applause during the credits.

What they were applauding wasn’t a particularly great performance or character, they were applauding the return of Tom Cruise the movie star, not the creepy Scientologist guy.

4 Responses to “Why Tom Cruise in TROPIC THUNDER Isn’t As Great As You Think”

Linz Says:

My problem with this character is that it implies that America has respect for Tom Cruise as an actor. And I get the feeling that the filmmakers here don’t quite have their fingers on the pulse of America with this one. We are tired of him. If this character were played by someone we still respected, and that also carries a good bit of clout in Hollywood, it would make more sense. I feel like Tommy is washed up and, therefore, forced upon us in this role.

shanna Says:

I see it slightly different. I think we were tired of him but America does respect him as an actor and his real life shenanigans were bleeding over into our image of him as an actor. This role was the first time in a while that he didn’t come off as pretentious or high and mighty and we were all waiting for that.

I don’t think Tom was forced on us at all. Most people didn’t know he was in the film and seeing him like that without the prior notice made it all the more exciting and wonderful.

I don’t know if his performance was brilliant (RDJ really killed me every step of the way) but it was brilliant considering where he is at this stage of his career.

Jake Says:

I didn’t think his performance was as funny as everyone is making it out to be. If anyone deserved a thunderous applause for their performance, it was RDJ.

[…] not that I have anything against Cruise per se (despite the fact that this is the second time I’ve picked on him within a week), but I object to what I know his presence will do the […]

Leave a Reply